BETWEEN PATHS AND ROUTES: THE CHALLENGES, EMPHASIS AND CHARMS OF POSTSTRUCTURALIST RESEARCH IN THE AREA OF EDUCATION, GENDER AND SEXUALITY
Margens
BETWEEN PATHS AND ROUTES: THE CHALLENGES, EMPHASIS AND CHARMS OF POSTSTRUCTURALIST RESEARCH IN THE AREA OF EDUCATION, GENDER AND SEXUALITY
Autor Correspondente: Marcos Lopes de SOUZA | [email protected]
Palavras-chave: Post-structuralist. School. Gender. Sexuality. Experience.
Resumos Cadastrados
Resumo Português:
Neste artigo nos arriscamos a analisar os efeitos que as pesquisas pautadas na perspectiva pós-estruturalista produzem nas/os pesquisadoras/es que nela apostam. Para isso tomamos como análise as experiências de quatro pesquisadoras(es), um deles o orientador das(os) outras(os), no desenvolvimento de investigações que enfocaram as questões de gênero e sexualidade. Interrogamo-nos: quais as provocações, desarranjos e seduções possibilitadas pelas investigações pós-estruturalistas? O que as pesquisas produzidas com base na perspectiva pósestruturalista tem a nos ensinar sobre a formação da(o) pesquisador(a)? Algumas vezes, essas pesquisas abalam as certezas que aprendemos com a modernidade, nos desnudando e problematizando esse lugar de pesquisador(a). Por outro lado, ao assumirmos os desafios e embaraços, nos reinventamos. Inclusive, os espaços escolares em que essas pesquisas adentraram nos provocaram a mudar de caminhos, a desistir de alguns propósitos e a tomar outros direcionamentos. Quiçá, as pesquisas pautadas na perspectiva pósestruturalista abram os caminhos para enfrentarmos o (des)conhecido
Resumo Inglês:
In this article, we venture to analyze the effects that research based on a post-structuralist perspective produces on researchers who bet on it. For this, we took as an analysis the experiences of four researchers, one of them the advisor of the others, in the development of investigations that focused on gender and sexuality issues. We ask ourselves: what are the provocations, disruptions and seductions made possible by post-structuralist investigations? What research produced based on the post-structuralist perspective must teach us about the formation of the researcher? Sometimes, this research shakes the certainties that we have learned with modernity, denuding and problematizing this place of researcher. On the other hand, when we take on challenges and embarrassments, we reinvent ourselves. Also, the school spaces in which this research entered caused us to change paths, to give up on some purposes and to take other directions. Perhaps, research based on a post-structuralist perspective opens the way for us to face the (un)known.
