Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia

Endereço:
RODOVIA WASHINGTON LUíS, KM 235 CAIXA POSTAL 676
São Carlos / SP
13565905
Site: http://www.rbf-bjpt.org.br/
Telefone: (16) 3351-8755
ISSN: 14133555
Editor Chefe: 11
Início Publicação: 29/02/1996
Periodicidade: Bimestral

Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Ano: 2013 | Volume: 17 | Número: 2
Autores: Daniel M. Coelho, Guilherme H. Bonagamba, Anamaria S. Oliveira
Autor Correspondente: Daniel M. Coelho | [email protected]

Palavras-chave: physical therapy; scoliometer; scoliosis; spine; evaluation

Resumos Cadastrados

Resumo Inglês:

BACKGROUND:

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis are exposed to approximately 25 radiographic examinations of their spine throughout the clinical follow-up using the Cobb angle. Several non-invasive and radiation-free methods have been proposed to measure scoliotic deformities, including the scoliometer.

OBJECTIVES:

To measure the intra- and interrater reliability of the scoliometer measurements, to assess the correlation of the values obtained by the scoliometer measurements with the Cobb angles obtained by radiography, and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the scoliometer measurements for the different diagnostic criteria for the referral of idiopathic scoliosis.

METHOD:

Sixty-four patients were selected for the study: half with idiopathic scoliosis and half without. The 17 levels of the spine of each volunteer were measured with a scoliometer in the forward bending position. The measurements were performed three times on 42 volunteers by two different raters to obtain data for calculating the reliability values. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken to determine the Cobb angles, which were then compared with the highest trunk rotation value. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using radiograph criteria for referral: a Cobb angle of 10º and axial trunk rotation values between 5º and 10º.

RESULTS:

Excellent intrarater reliability values and very good interrater reliability values were obtained. The correlation between the scoliometer measurements and radiograph analyses was considered good (r=0.7, p<0.05). The highest sensitivity value was for a trunk rotation of 5º at 87%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The scoliometer measurements showed a good correlation with the radiographic measurements.

Key words: physical therapy; scoliometer; scoliosis; spine; evaluation