Respiratory pattern of diaphragmatic breathing and pilates breathing in COPD subjects

Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia

Endereço:
RODOVIA WASHINGTON LUíS, KM 235 CAIXA POSTAL 676
São Carlos / SP
13565905
Site: http://www.rbf-bjpt.org.br/
Telefone: (16) 3351-8755
ISSN: 14133555
Editor Chefe: 11
Início Publicação: 29/02/1996
Periodicidade: Bimestral

Respiratory pattern of diaphragmatic breathing and pilates breathing in COPD subjects

Ano: 2014 | Volume: 18 | Número: 4
Autores: Karina M. Cancelliero-Gaiad, Daniela Ike, Camila B. F. Pantoni, Audrey Borghi-Silva, Dirceu Costa
Autor Correspondente: Dirceu Costa | [email protected]

Palavras-chave: physical therapy; COPD; plethysmography; breathing

Resumos Cadastrados

Resumo Inglês:

BACKGROUND:

Diaphragmatic breathing (DB) is widely used in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), however it has been little studied in the scientific literature. The Pilates breathing (PB) method has also been used in the rehabilitation area and has been little studied in the scientific literature and in COPD.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare ventilatory parameters during DB and PB in COPD patients and healthy adults.

METHOD:

Fifteen COPD patients (COPD group) and fifteen healthy patients (healthy group) performed three types of respiration: natural breathing (NB), DB, and PB, with the respiratory pattern being analyzed by respiratory inductive plethysmography. The parameters of time, volume, and thoracoabdominal coordination were evaluated. After the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, ANOVA was applied followed by Tukey's test (intragroup analysis) and Student's t-test (intergroup analysis; p<0.05).

RESULTS:

DB promoted increase in respiratory volumes, times, and SpO2 as well as decrease in respiratory rate in both groups. PB increased respiratory volumes in healthy group, with no additional benefits of respiratory pattern in the COPD group. With respect to thoracoabdominal coordination, both groups presented higher asynchrony during DB, with a greater increase in the healthy group.

CONCLUSIONS:

DB showed positive effects such as increase in lung volumes, respiratory motion, and SpO2 and reduction in respiratory rate. Although there were no changes in volume and time measurements during PB in COPD, this breathing pattern increased volumes in the healthy subjects and increased oxygenation in both groups. In this context, the acute benefits of DB are emphasized as a supporting treatment in respiratory rehabilitation programs.